Mortgage Loan Processing

Navigation
Related Links

What's  New

NLP launches new website 6/1/06 geared toward mortgage brokers, lenders and mortgage processors...

Learn how to become a mortgage loan processor with LoanProcessorTraining.org...

My Now providing contract mortgage underwriting services...

 

ellie_mae_logo.gif


Mortgage Processors... Join NAMP Now!

Mortgage Loan Processor News -- Bookmark this page! Enjoy reading the latest news on mortgage loan processing, mortgage loan news, mortgage interest rates, contract mortgage processing, mortgage loan processor jobs and more!
Monday, June 21, 2004

You Can Lose Money Without Contract Contingencies

by Benny L. Kass

Question: I think we are in trouble. Three weeks ago, we signed a contract to purchase a single-family house. Our real estate broker told us that there was a lot of interest in the property and if we really wanted to buy we should not put any contingencies into our contract offer. We thought that we could qualify for a mortgage loan, and took the broker's advice. It now turns out that our credit score is too low and our mortgage lender has turned us down for the loan.

We put up a $20,000 earnest money deposit, and are now concerned that we may lose this money -- as well as the house -- if we are unable to get a loan.

Are we in trouble?

Answer: Yes, you may be in serious trouble if you cannot salvage the deal. There are two very important buyer provisions which should be contained in every real estate contract: a financing contingency and a home inspection contingency.

A contingency is defined as a stated event spelled out in the contract, which must occur before a real estate contract is binding. Let's look at both of these contingencies:

Financing: You are purchasing a house for $300,000, and plan to get an 80 percent loan, in the amount of $240,000. That means that you have to make up the 20 percent difference ($60,000) with your own cash, in addition to the various closing and lender charges which will occur at settlement. The monthly mortgage payment for a $240,000 mortgage, based on a 6 percent rate, amortized over 30 years will be $1438.94. You also will have to pay real estate taxes and insurance, which could cost you $300-400 more a month.

Mortgage lenders have formulas whereby they can determine whether a potential buyer can qualify for a loan. Obviously, a lender does not want to lend money to a person who just cannot afford the monthly payments. All legitimate mortgage lenders do not want to foreclose on your house; they want you to be successful with your new home purchase.

You should have talked to a mortgage lender before you signed the contract, to determine whether you can, in fact, qualify for a loan. Most lenders will give you a preliminary (comfort) letter, which states that subject to an accurate appraisal of the property, based on the financial information you have provided the lender, you can qualify for a loan up to a certain amount.

You should never give that comfort letter to a seller until after you sign the contract. Why not? If, for example, you are negotiating the sales price, and the seller learns from the comfort letter that you can qualify for a higher purchase price than you are offering, the seller may not be so inclined to negotiate the sales price down.

But, the comfort letter should be in your hands, so that you know approximately how much money you can borrow.

Your sales contract must contain a provision that the contract is contingent -- for a period of days (usually 20-30) -- upon your ability to get the appropriate financing. During this contingency period, your lender will appraise the property and evaluate your credit. If you qualify, you will get a loan commitment letter. If you do not qualify, the lender is required by law to give you a rejection letter. That rejection letter must be given to the seller (or the seller's agent) before the contingency period ends. If the time deadlines are not met, you will have to purchase the property or possibly forfeit your earnest money deposit.

Home Inspection: Are you a structural engineer? Do you have experience with home construction? If not, you must include a contingency that gives you a period of time (usually 7-10 days) after the contract is signed to have the house inspected. If you are dissatisfied with the inspection report, and you advise the seller within the contingency period, you can either terminate the contract and get your deposit back or negotiate some credits with the seller so as to compensate you for the inspection deficiencies which you will have to correct, at your expense.

Now, let's look at your specific situation. Your contract did not contain a financing contingency and you cannot get a loan. Under the standard real estate contract, you stand to lose your deposit.

However, you should immediately explain the situation with your seller. I would talk directly to the seller, rather than have the real estate brokers talking to each other. It may very well be that the seller has other offers (indeed some that may be higher than your contract price) in which case the seller will release you from the contract and return your deposit to you.

If the seller is uncooperative, here are some other suggestions:


Ask your lender to reconsider. Lenders are willing to take greater risks for higher interest rates. Depending on the rate, you probably will be better off paying a little more money each and every month for your mortgage payment rather than lose your deposit.

Immediately look for other mortgage lenders. Lenders have a multitude of mortgage programs, and perhaps one of these will meet your needs.

Do you have any friends or relatives who will be willing to either co-sign on the loan with you or at least guarantee payment on your loan should you be in default?

Finally, consult your attorney. There may be some technical glitches in the sales contract which would give you the right to claim that the contract is invalid and that you should get a return of your deposit.
You must always include these two contingencies into your sales contract, or you may be faced with a serious loss of money.

Published: June 21, 2004

Author of the weekly Housing Counsel column with The Washington Post for nearly 30 years, Benny Kass is the senior partner with the Washington, DC law firm of Kass, Mitek & Kass, PLLC and a specialist in such real estate legal areas as commercial and residential financing, closings, foreclosures and workouts.
Mr. Kass is a Charter Member of the College of Community Association Attorneys, and has written extensively about community association issues. In addition, he is a life member of the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. In this capacity, he has been involved in the development of almost all of the Commission’s real estate laws, including the Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act which has been adopted in many states.

Copyright © 2004 Realty Times. All Rights Reserved.


Top of Page View Archives >>

Delinquency And Foreclosure Rates Down Over Past Year

by Kenneth R. Harney

Are American homeowners loaded down with dangerously high mortgage debt, foreshadowing rising loan delinquencies and foreclosures just over the horizon?

Some Chicken Little "housing bubble" theorists would have you think so. But the hard statistics about homeowners' management of their mortgage debts suggest otherwise -- dramatically so.

In its latest quarterly delinquency and foreclosure survey, released last week, the Mortgage Bankers Association of America found that from the first quarter of 2003 through the same period of 2004, delinquency rates on all home loans in the United States dropped by more than half a percentage point.

Among "prime" mortgage borrowers --those with good credit at loan application -- the percentage of loans 30 days delinquent declined from 2.4 percent at the end of 2003 to 2.26 percent at the end of March 2004.

Douglas Duncan, the MBAA's chief economist, said the "trend is downward," indicating that most homeowners are handling their mortgage responsibilities well. Even subprime borrowers -- those whose low credit scores at the time of home purchase or refinance indicated higher risks of delinquency -- are doing better. The seasonally-adjusted subprime delinquency rate dropped 40 basis points (.4 percent) last quarter. Federal Housing Administration (FHA) borrowers also improved their on-time payment performances, lowering the FHA delinquency rate by 55 basis points (.55 percent).

By region, homeowners in the southern states tended to have the highest overall rate of late payments -- 4.72 percent delinquency, followed by the north-central states (4.0 percent), and the northeast (3.5 percent) and the west (2.65 percent).

Economists consider delinquency rates to be a key early-warning indicator of broad-based financial stress among home-owning households. When the economy slips into recession, or households max out their debtloads, delinquency and foreclosure rates both increase. However, the MBAA study found that the national foreclosure rate during the past year has dropped to 1.27 percent, down 16 basis points (.16 percent) from the first quarter of 2003.

The slow, steady decline in both serious delinquencies and foreclosures is attributable in part to the widespread adoption by lenders and mortgage servicers of "loss-mitigation" intervention strategies. Mandated by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the FHA for all mortgage servicers doing business with them, loss-mitigation techniques include forbearance and loan-restructuring arrangements that allow borrowers to get out from under their arrearages. Sometimes short-term delinquent borrowers are kept out of serious delinquencies by reschedulings of their payments, or increases in the terms of their loans. The basic idea is to keep borrowers out of long-term delinquencies and foreclosures, provided their financial problems can be alleviated through short-term measures.

Published: June 21, 2004

Kenneth R. Harney writes an award-winning, nationally-syndicated column on housing and real estate from Washington, D.C. He is also managing director of the National Real Estate Development Center, a professional education company. He is a past member of the Federal Reserve Board's Consumer Advisory Council, a committee that by federal statute reviews all Fed actions on home mortgage, consmer credit and banking industry regulation.
He served as a member of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's Working Group on Computerized Loan Origination (CLO) systems, and is a member of the Editorial Board of the Fannie Mae Foundation's journal, Housing Policy Debate. He is the author of two books on mortgage finance and real estate.

Copyright © 2004 Realty Times. All Rights Reserved.


Top of Page View Archives >>

Archives

-Tuesday, March 09, 2004
-Wednesday, March 10, 2004
-Friday, March 12, 2004
-Monday, March 15, 2004
-Tuesday, March 16, 2004
-Monday, March 22, 2004
-Tuesday, March 23, 2004
-Wednesday, March 24, 2004
-Friday, March 26, 2004
-Monday, March 29, 2004
-Friday, April 02, 2004
-Tuesday, April 06, 2004
-Wednesday, April 07, 2004
-Thursday, April 08, 2004
-Friday, April 09, 2004
-Monday, April 12, 2004
-Tuesday, April 13, 2004
-Thursday, April 15, 2004
-Monday, April 19, 2004
-Tuesday, April 20, 2004
-Thursday, April 22, 2004
-Friday, April 23, 2004
-Monday, April 26, 2004
-Tuesday, April 27, 2004
-Wednesday, April 28, 2004
-Thursday, April 29, 2004
-Friday, April 30, 2004
-Monday, May 03, 2004
-Tuesday, May 04, 2004
-Wednesday, May 05, 2004
-Thursday, May 06, 2004
-Friday, May 07, 2004
-Monday, May 10, 2004
-Tuesday, May 11, 2004
-Wednesday, May 12, 2004
-Thursday, May 13, 2004
-Friday, May 14, 2004
-Monday, May 17, 2004
-Tuesday, May 18, 2004
-Wednesday, May 19, 2004
-Thursday, May 20, 2004
-Monday, May 24, 2004
-Tuesday, May 25, 2004
-Wednesday, May 26, 2004
-Wednesday, June 02, 2004
-Thursday, June 03, 2004
-Friday, June 04, 2004
-Monday, June 07, 2004
-Tuesday, June 08, 2004
-Wednesday, June 09, 2004
-Thursday, June 10, 2004
-Friday, June 11, 2004
-Tuesday, June 15, 2004
-Thursday, June 17, 2004
-Friday, June 18, 2004
-Monday, June 21, 2004
-Tuesday, June 22, 2004
-Wednesday, June 23, 2004
-Thursday, June 24, 2004
-Friday, June 25, 2004
-Tuesday, June 29, 2004
-Wednesday, June 30, 2004
-Thursday, July 01, 2004
-Friday, July 02, 2004
-Tuesday, July 06, 2004
-Wednesday, July 07, 2004
-Thursday, July 08, 2004
-Friday, July 09, 2004
-Monday, July 12, 2004
-Tuesday, July 13, 2004
-Wednesday, July 14, 2004
-Thursday, July 15, 2004
-Friday, July 16, 2004
-Monday, July 19, 2004
-Tuesday, July 20, 2004
-Wednesday, July 21, 2004
-Friday, July 23, 2004
-Tuesday, July 27, 2004
-Wednesday, July 28, 2004
-Friday, July 30, 2004
-Wednesday, August 11, 2004
-Thursday, August 12, 2004
-Monday, August 16, 2004
-Wednesday, August 18, 2004
-Thursday, August 19, 2004
-Friday, August 20, 2004
-Monday, August 30, 2004
-Monday, September 13, 2004
-Tuesday, September 14, 2004
-Wednesday, September 15, 2004
-Monday, September 20, 2004
-Tuesday, September 21, 2004
-Monday, September 27, 2004
-Wednesday, September 29, 2004
-Tuesday, October 05, 2004
-Friday, October 08, 2004
-Monday, October 11, 2004
-Tuesday, October 12, 2004
-Thursday, October 14, 2004
-Monday, October 18, 2004
-Thursday, October 21, 2004
-Friday, October 22, 2004
-Tuesday, October 26, 2004
-Thursday, October 28, 2004
-Wednesday, November 03, 2004
-Thursday, November 04, 2004
-Sunday, November 07, 2004
-Monday, November 08, 2004
-Thursday, November 11, 2004
-Tuesday, November 16, 2004
-Monday, November 22, 2004
-Monday, November 29, 2004
-Wednesday, December 01, 2004
-Monday, December 06, 2004
-Tuesday, December 07, 2004
-Saturday, December 11, 2004
-Tuesday, December 14, 2004
-Thursday, December 16, 2004
-Thursday, January 06, 2005
-Monday, January 10, 2005
-Wednesday, January 12, 2005
-Friday, January 14, 2005
-Wednesday, January 19, 2005
-Thursday, January 20, 2005
-Tuesday, January 25, 2005
-Thursday, January 27, 2005
-Friday, January 28, 2005
-Monday, January 31, 2005
-Wednesday, February 09, 2005
-Tuesday, February 15, 2005
-Monday, February 21, 2005
-Friday, March 11, 2005
-Tuesday, March 15, 2005
-Monday, April 04, 2005
-Wednesday, April 13, 2005
-Monday, May 09, 2005
-Monday, September 19, 2005
-Wednesday, October 19, 2005
-Tuesday, January 31, 2006
-Monday, February 13, 2006
-Wednesday, February 15, 2006
-Tuesday, February 21, 2006
-Friday, February 24, 2006
-Monday, February 27, 2006
-Monday, March 06, 2006
-Tuesday, March 07, 2006
-Wednesday, March 08, 2006
-Wednesday, March 15, 2006
-Thursday, March 16, 2006
-Friday, March 17, 2006
-Monday, March 20, 2006
-Tuesday, March 21, 2006
-Monday, March 27, 2006
-Tuesday, March 28, 2006
-Wednesday, March 29, 2006
-Saturday, April 01, 2006
-Monday, April 03, 2006
-Tuesday, April 25, 2006
-Tuesday, May 09, 2006
-Thursday, May 25, 2006
-Thursday, June 01, 2006
-Wednesday, June 07, 2006
-Monday, June 19, 2006
-Tuesday, July 11, 2006
-Wednesday, July 12, 2006
-Wednesday, August 09, 2006
-Saturday, August 12, 2006
-Thursday, November 02, 2006
-Tuesday, November 21, 2006
-Thursday, May 17, 2007
-Thursday, July 26, 2007
-Sunday, May 11, 2008

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?