|
|
Mortgage Loan Processing |
![]() ![]() What's NewNLP launches new website 6/1/06 geared toward mortgage brokers, lenders and mortgage processors...
Learn how to become a mortgage loan processor with LoanProcessorTraining.org...
My Now providing contract mortgage underwriting services...
|
|||
|
Mortgage Loan Processor News -- Bookmark this page! Enjoy reading the latest news on mortgage loan processing, mortgage loan news, mortgage interest rates, contract mortgage processing, mortgage loan processor jobs and more!
Tuesday, June 29, 2004
Bubble Worries Deflated But Not Gone
by Peter G. Miller
Home prices have been rising with great ferocity in recent years, a matter which suggests to some that a real estate bubble is surely ahead. Now from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York -- that citadel of capitalism -- we hear something which approaches common sense: Home prices may not rise everywhere and everyday, but real estate has done wonderfully well in recent years and relative to other investment options offers a surprising level of security and potential. That's the message I got after reading Are Home Prices the Next "Bubble"? by Jonathan McCarthy, a senior economist, and Richard W. Peach, a vice president, at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. "Home prices," say the authors, "have been rising rapidly. Since 1995, real home prices have increased about 36 percent, roughly double the increase of previous home price booms in the late 1970s and late 1980s. Moreover, home prices continued to rise strongly during the 2001 recession, the sluggish recovery through mid-2003, and the recent period of more rapid growth." The result of such increases is that real estate represents substantially more wealth than stocks and bonds. In the third quarter of 2003, "households held about $14.6 trillion in real estate," they say. Today, of course, as a matter of generally rising values the total is no doubt larger. "By comparison, households held about $12.8 trillion of corporate equities and mutual funds" in the first quarter of 2000 -- what the authors describe as "the peak of the stock market." "Our main conclusion," say McCarthy and Peach, "is that the most widely cited evidence of a bubble is not persuasive because it fails to account for developments in the housing market over the past decade. In particular, significant declines in nominal mortgage interest rates and demographic forces have supported housing demand, home construction, and home values during this period. Taking these factors into account, we argue that market fundamentals are sufficiently strong to explain the recent path of home prices and support our view that a bubble does not exist." The latest news on the home front surely supports the authors. According to the National Association of Realtors, existing-home sales chugged along at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 6.80 million units in May, the latest available figure and a record. "The national median existing-home price was $183,600 in May," says NAR, "up 10.3 percent from May 2003 when the median price was $166,400. The median is a typical market price where half of the homes sold for more and half sold for less." New-home builders are also have a joyous season. The National Association of Home Builders says that in May "single-family housing starts rose 1.4 percent in the month to an historically healthy seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.64 million units." Peach and McCarthy deal with the question of why home prices rise. Yes, some of the increase is simply a result of inflation. However, the authors also say that "a significant portion" of price increases relate to quality; that is, the desire of people to live in better houses, homes with more features and bigger houses. If there was a substantial housing decline, the authors say consumer spending would drop by about $150 billion a year. That's not a lot in the context of an $11 trillion economy. Why so little impact if real estate values decline? Most homes are not for sale at any given time and most owners have now locked-in fixed-rate loans at recent low rates. That said, it remains prudent to consider that real estate is a commodity best held over the long term, that prices have fallen in local communities even as national trends have edged higher and that despite generally good economic news we still have an enormous budget shortfall, a huge balance-of-payments problem, worries about job quality and unemployment, jobs flowing overseas and a dependency on foreign oil which is unhealthy in terms of both dollars and politics. And we're at war. For more articles by Peter G. Miller, please press here. Published: June 29, 2004 Peter G. Miller, also known as OurBroker®, is the author of six real estate books -- including The Common-Sense Mortgage -- and is the original creator and host of America Online's Real Estate Center. Mr. Miller welcomes your questions, comments, and news releases via e-mail at peter@ourbroker.com. Copyright © 2004 Realty Times. All Rights Reserved.
Bubble Worries Deflated But Not Gone
by Peter G. Miller
Home prices have been rising with great ferocity in recent years, a matter which suggests to some that a real estate bubble is surely ahead. Now from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York -- that citadel of capitalism -- we hear something which approaches common sense: Home prices may not rise everywhere and everyday, but real estate has done wonderfully well in recent years and relative to other investment options offers a surprising level of security and potential. That's the message I got after reading Are Home Prices the Next "Bubble"? by Jonathan McCarthy, a senior economist, and Richard W. Peach, a vice president, at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. "Home prices," say the authors, "have been rising rapidly. Since 1995, real home prices have increased about 36 percent, roughly double the increase of previous home price booms in the late 1970s and late 1980s. Moreover, home prices continued to rise strongly during the 2001 recession, the sluggish recovery through mid-2003, and the recent period of more rapid growth." The result of such increases is that real estate represents substantially more wealth than stocks and bonds. In the third quarter of 2003, "households held about $14.6 trillion in real estate," they say. Today, of course, as a matter of generally rising values the total is no doubt larger. "By comparison, households held about $12.8 trillion of corporate equities and mutual funds" in the first quarter of 2000 -- what the authors describe as "the peak of the stock market." "Our main conclusion," say McCarthy and Peach, "is that the most widely cited evidence of a bubble is not persuasive because it fails to account for developments in the housing market over the past decade. In particular, significant declines in nominal mortgage interest rates and demographic forces have supported housing demand, home construction, and home values during this period. Taking these factors into account, we argue that market fundamentals are sufficiently strong to explain the recent path of home prices and support our view that a bubble does not exist." The latest news on the home front surely supports the authors. According to the National Association of Realtors, existing-home sales chugged along at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 6.80 million units in May, the latest available figure and a record. "The national median existing-home price was $183,600 in May," says NAR, "up 10.3 percent from May 2003 when the median price was $166,400. The median is a typical market price where half of the homes sold for more and half sold for less." New-home builders are also have a joyous season. The National Association of Home Builders says that in May "single-family housing starts rose 1.4 percent in the month to an historically healthy seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.64 million units." Peach and McCarthy deal with the question of why home prices rise. Yes, some of the increase is simply a result of inflation. However, the authors also say that "a significant portion" of price increases relate to quality; that is, the desire of people to live in better houses, homes with more features and bigger houses. If there was a substantial housing decline, the authors say consumer spending would drop by about $150 billion a year. That's not a lot in the context of an $11 trillion economy. Why so little impact if real estate values decline? Most homes are not for sale at any given time and most owners have now locked-in fixed-rate loans at recent low rates. That said, it remains prudent to consider that real estate is a commodity best held over the long term, that prices have fallen in local communities even as national trends have edged higher and that despite generally good economic news we still have an enormous budget shortfall, a huge balance-of-payments problem, worries about job quality and unemployment, jobs flowing overseas and a dependency on foreign oil which is unhealthy in terms of both dollars and politics. And we're at war. For more articles by Peter G. Miller, please press here. Published: June 29, 2004 Peter G. Miller, also known as OurBroker®, is the author of six real estate books -- including The Common-Sense Mortgage -- and is the original creator and host of America Online's Real Estate Center. Mr. Miller welcomes your questions, comments, and news releases via e-mail at peter@ourbroker.com. Copyright © 2004 Realty Times. All Rights Reserved.
Archives-Tuesday, March 09, 2004-Wednesday, March 10, 2004 -Friday, March 12, 2004 -Monday, March 15, 2004 -Tuesday, March 16, 2004 -Monday, March 22, 2004 -Tuesday, March 23, 2004 -Wednesday, March 24, 2004 -Friday, March 26, 2004 -Monday, March 29, 2004 -Friday, April 02, 2004 -Tuesday, April 06, 2004 -Wednesday, April 07, 2004 -Thursday, April 08, 2004 -Friday, April 09, 2004 -Monday, April 12, 2004 -Tuesday, April 13, 2004 -Thursday, April 15, 2004 -Monday, April 19, 2004 -Tuesday, April 20, 2004 -Thursday, April 22, 2004 -Friday, April 23, 2004 -Monday, April 26, 2004 -Tuesday, April 27, 2004 -Wednesday, April 28, 2004 -Thursday, April 29, 2004 -Friday, April 30, 2004 -Monday, May 03, 2004 -Tuesday, May 04, 2004 -Wednesday, May 05, 2004 -Thursday, May 06, 2004 -Friday, May 07, 2004 -Monday, May 10, 2004 -Tuesday, May 11, 2004 -Wednesday, May 12, 2004 -Thursday, May 13, 2004 -Friday, May 14, 2004 -Monday, May 17, 2004 -Tuesday, May 18, 2004 -Wednesday, May 19, 2004 -Thursday, May 20, 2004 -Monday, May 24, 2004 -Tuesday, May 25, 2004 -Wednesday, May 26, 2004 -Wednesday, June 02, 2004 -Thursday, June 03, 2004 -Friday, June 04, 2004 -Monday, June 07, 2004 -Tuesday, June 08, 2004 -Wednesday, June 09, 2004 -Thursday, June 10, 2004 -Friday, June 11, 2004 -Tuesday, June 15, 2004 -Thursday, June 17, 2004 -Friday, June 18, 2004 -Monday, June 21, 2004 -Tuesday, June 22, 2004 -Wednesday, June 23, 2004 -Thursday, June 24, 2004 -Friday, June 25, 2004 -Tuesday, June 29, 2004 -Wednesday, June 30, 2004 -Thursday, July 01, 2004 -Friday, July 02, 2004 -Tuesday, July 06, 2004 -Wednesday, July 07, 2004 -Thursday, July 08, 2004 -Friday, July 09, 2004 -Monday, July 12, 2004 -Tuesday, July 13, 2004 -Wednesday, July 14, 2004 -Thursday, July 15, 2004 -Friday, July 16, 2004 -Monday, July 19, 2004 -Tuesday, July 20, 2004 -Wednesday, July 21, 2004 -Friday, July 23, 2004 -Tuesday, July 27, 2004 -Wednesday, July 28, 2004 -Friday, July 30, 2004 -Wednesday, August 11, 2004 -Thursday, August 12, 2004 -Monday, August 16, 2004 -Wednesday, August 18, 2004 -Thursday, August 19, 2004 -Friday, August 20, 2004 -Monday, August 30, 2004 -Monday, September 13, 2004 -Tuesday, September 14, 2004 -Wednesday, September 15, 2004 -Monday, September 20, 2004 -Tuesday, September 21, 2004 -Monday, September 27, 2004 -Wednesday, September 29, 2004 -Tuesday, October 05, 2004 -Friday, October 08, 2004 -Monday, October 11, 2004 -Tuesday, October 12, 2004 -Thursday, October 14, 2004 -Monday, October 18, 2004 -Thursday, October 21, 2004 -Friday, October 22, 2004 -Tuesday, October 26, 2004 -Thursday, October 28, 2004 -Wednesday, November 03, 2004 -Thursday, November 04, 2004 -Sunday, November 07, 2004 -Monday, November 08, 2004 -Thursday, November 11, 2004 -Tuesday, November 16, 2004 -Monday, November 22, 2004 -Monday, November 29, 2004 -Wednesday, December 01, 2004 -Monday, December 06, 2004 -Tuesday, December 07, 2004 -Saturday, December 11, 2004 -Tuesday, December 14, 2004 -Thursday, December 16, 2004 -Thursday, January 06, 2005 -Monday, January 10, 2005 -Wednesday, January 12, 2005 -Friday, January 14, 2005 -Wednesday, January 19, 2005 -Thursday, January 20, 2005 -Tuesday, January 25, 2005 -Thursday, January 27, 2005 -Friday, January 28, 2005 -Monday, January 31, 2005 -Wednesday, February 09, 2005 -Tuesday, February 15, 2005 -Monday, February 21, 2005 -Friday, March 11, 2005 -Tuesday, March 15, 2005 -Monday, April 04, 2005 -Wednesday, April 13, 2005 -Monday, May 09, 2005 -Monday, September 19, 2005 -Wednesday, October 19, 2005 -Tuesday, January 31, 2006 -Monday, February 13, 2006 -Wednesday, February 15, 2006 -Tuesday, February 21, 2006 -Friday, February 24, 2006 -Monday, February 27, 2006 -Monday, March 06, 2006 -Tuesday, March 07, 2006 -Wednesday, March 08, 2006 -Wednesday, March 15, 2006 -Thursday, March 16, 2006 -Friday, March 17, 2006 -Monday, March 20, 2006 -Tuesday, March 21, 2006 -Monday, March 27, 2006 -Tuesday, March 28, 2006 -Wednesday, March 29, 2006 -Saturday, April 01, 2006 -Monday, April 03, 2006 -Tuesday, April 25, 2006 -Tuesday, May 09, 2006 -Thursday, May 25, 2006 -Thursday, June 01, 2006 -Wednesday, June 07, 2006 -Monday, June 19, 2006 -Tuesday, July 11, 2006 -Wednesday, July 12, 2006 -Wednesday, August 09, 2006 -Saturday, August 12, 2006 -Thursday, November 02, 2006 -Tuesday, November 21, 2006 -Thursday, May 17, 2007 -Thursday, July 26, 2007 -Sunday, May 11, 2008 |
|
||||




