|
|
Mortgage Loan Processing |
![]() ![]() What's NewNLP launches new website 6/1/06 geared toward mortgage brokers, lenders and mortgage processors...
Learn how to become a mortgage loan processor with LoanProcessorTraining.org...
My Now providing contract mortgage underwriting services...
|
|||
|
Mortgage Loan Processor News -- Bookmark this page! Enjoy reading the latest news on mortgage loan processing, mortgage loan news, mortgage interest rates, contract mortgage processing, mortgage loan processor jobs and more!
Tuesday, July 06, 2004
Builders, Buyers And A New Home Warranty Program
by PJ Wade
Working title: Too many Canadians associate "new" with "problem free" and are disappointed when their new house or condominium is far from perfect. As housing demand continues to give builders and tradespeople the upper hand, new home buyers should use every resource available to ensure they get what they want. Canadian new home buyers often overlook two questions vital to final satisfaction with their new house or condominium. In early conversations with a builder or developer, they should make sure they get clear -- ideally written -- answers to these questions: Which warranty program or warranties cover this new house/condominium? What are the terms of this warranty? Savvy buyers will then contact the organization offering the warranty and find out exactly what is covered and what restrictions are involved. What specific timelines builders must work to and what dispute resolution services are offered? What clout does the warranty organization have with builders in settling a dispute? Provincial and private New Home Warranty Programs all operate differently and are continually changing. Keep up to date during your construction project to save headaches later. Tarion Warranty Corporation -- formerly the Ontario New Home Warranty Program (ONHWP) -- recently announced changes designed to "achieve excellence in customer service and to build long-term customer value for both purchasers of new homes and the Ontario home building industry." Although education and builder licensing are key Tarion functions, its primary purpose is enforcement of the Ontario New Home Warranties Plan Act by ensuring that builders abide by the Act and consumers are protected when builders do not fulfill their warranty obligations. Over the years, Tarion, a private corporation, has paid out over $190 million in claims from its guarantee fund. Financed entirely by builder registration, renewal and home enrolment fees, Tarion receives no government funding and has guaranteed warranty protection for well over 1.2 million new homes. This program does not replace manufacturer warranties, nor does it cover additional builder warranties. As the regulator of Ontario's new home building industry, Tarion is taking a more aggressive approach to finding and prosecuting illegal builders. In 2003, 831 charges were laid, a 50 per cent increase over 2002. Tarion is consolidating its offices and operations and in October 2004 will open a new centralized Customer Centre in the Greater Toronto Area. Using its website and interactive design concepts, Tarion will continue to deliver services across Ontario. The new centralized facilities will house a Call Centre, a new centralized Claims Department and a new Builder Relations Department, created to "work proactively with home builders throughout the province." Claims Representatives will be based in home offices across the province. "We are leaving an outdated service delivery system and changing to modern centralized facilities that will provide our employees with challenging new roles using the latest technology," said Tarion President & CEO, Greg Gee. "The goal of this restructuring is to provide both consumers and builders with a broader range of services delivered with a focus on excellence in customer service." Tarion may help you become a better new home buyer through these and other services: Call 1-800-668-0124 toll-free, if you have questions about warranty coverage or business processes, and to find out whether a builder is registered with Tarion. Through you can learn how many claims a builder has had and the amount of money paid out. Construction Performance Guidelines is a handy reference guide covering over 240 possible conditions and outlining minimum performance standards and defects that are covered under statutory warranty and those that are not. Tarion requires builders to provide a Homeowner Information Package to new home buyers on or before their Pre-Delivery Inspection. Although buyers are encouraged to review this package again within the first 30 days after taking possession and again at least 30 days prior to the first anniversary of your date of possession, you might want an advance look at the full statutory warranty benefits you are entitled to. Remember, buyers are responsible for completing all Warranty Service Forms and for submitting copies, to both the builder and Tarion, by the deadlines indicated. While every new home in Ontario comes with warranty coverage guaranteed by Tarion, don't be mislead into believing that every home that looks "new" to you is covered. Houses, semi-detached units and condominiums in any of the following categories are NOT covered by the new home warranty program: Cottages and temporary or seasonal homes not built on permanent foundations and not sufficiently insulated to enable year-round living Homes built on existing footings or foundations Homes and condominiums built in converted buildings Homes that have been lived in or rented by the builder before they are sold Homes that are built by their owners. Make sure your definition of "new" does not leave you without established warranty protection. Published: July 6, 2004 PJ Wade, The Improvement Coach, is a business strategist and an internationally recognized authority on retirement and the Maturing Marketplace (= baby boomers and seniors). PJ's firm, The Catalyst, provides strategic communication and educational services to the financial, healthcare and housing sectors - and the clients they serve.Author of 6 books and over 850 published articles, PJ's current books are Have Your Home and Money Too, "the owner's manual for your home," (Wiley, ISBN 0-471-64400-5) and Caring for Your Aging Parents (Coles, ISBN 0-7740-0613-7). PJ is a widely-known and often-quoted financial commentator and a popular strategic speaker. For more, visit http://www.thecatalyst.com. Copyright © 2004 Realty Times. All Rights Reserved.
Are We Over-Protecting Home Buyers?
by Peter G. Miller
But now arises a medical question which -- as we shall soon see -- relates to real estate: Has medical testing reached the point where it has spawned an industry dedicated to more tests -- even if healthcare is not improved? Writing in The Washington Post, Dr. H. Gilbert Welch -- a professor of medicine with the Department of Veterans Affairs and Dartmouth Medical School -- says "the harder we look, the more we find. CAT scans of the chest lead more people to be told they have lung cancer, and there are even more abnormalities to find in the abdomen. As one radiologist who has read thousands of these scans put it, 'with this level of information, I have yet to see a normal patient.'" Welch, the author of "Should I Be Tested for Cancer? Maybe Not and Here's Why" also says: "Millions of healthy Americans are being told that they are sick (or 'at risk'). More are undergoing invasive evaluations with needles, flexible scopes and catheters. And more are taking drugs for early forms of diabetes, heart disease, osteoporosis, hepatitis, vascular disease and cancer. "We need to start asking hard questions about whose interests are served by the relentless pursuit of disease in people who are well. Clearly it's good business -- for test manufacturers, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies. And it's good for some doctors." See: Dangers in Early Detection, July 1, 2004 We have a parallel dilemma in real estate. We have lots of tests, few people who say homes are imperfect -- or that testing is a business. I have very much favored home inspections because I though they were good for sellers (to head off future claims of concealed damage) and buyers (to better understand a property and its condition). I also think checks for wood-boring inspects should be made, in part because they're quick and cheap. But there's no doubt that more tests will discover more "problems" -- and things which would have been perfectly acceptable 10 years ago are suddenly matters of great concern. Visit any historic home used as a residence and you will inevitably find lead paint and mold. And yet, magically, people occupy such properties, sometimes generations within the same family, and -- usually -- without producing tree-dwelling, 12-toed mutant off-spring. The argument here is three-fold: First, we need to weigh costs and benefits. Think of radon. Is radon a problem if you're not a chain-smoking, basement dweller who has a day job in a uranium mine? How will you know? One study by the EPA found that 49.9 percent all positive tests were false. (See: "Technical Support Document for the 1992 Citizen's Guide to Radon," EPA, Page 3-11) The EPA's own Scientific Advisory Board said in a letter to the government that radon testing would produce 4.1 million "unnecessary mitigations" because the process was so uncertain. (May 22, 1992) Question: How much will 4.1 million unnecessary radon repairs cost the public? Can you say billions of dollars? (For a remarkable discussion of radon, see Leonard Cole's book, Element of Risk, The Politics of Radon.) Second, all homes are imperfect simply because homes are complex. Buyers must understand that they should be legitimately concerned with major problems -- but that they are buying homes in substantially the condition that existed as of the day of purchase. Third, a home inspection should not be seen as a club designed to force concessions from sellers, it is not a tool to re-open negotiations. It is, or should be, simply a way to better understand a property and its faults -- and there will be faults. Professional home inspections should be routine -- and most other tests should be required only on a case-by-case basis. The public must be told in writing of the accuracy of all tests offered and the fact that such tests can be wrong. Those who test should be forbidden from also making repairs because such dual roles represent at least the appearance of a conflict-of-interest. Instead, there should be those who offer tests and separate, unaffiliated firms that make repairs. Referral fees between the two groups should be banned, of course. Like the chest surgeon above who can never find a "normal" patient, more testing will simply produce more anxiety and more repairs -- many of which are simply unnecessary. It's time to put testing in perspective. For more articles by Peter G. Miller, please press here. Published: July 6, 2004 Peter G. Miller, also known as OurBroker®, is the author of six real estate books -- including The Common-Sense Mortgage -- and is the original creator and host of America Online's Real Estate Center. Mr. Miller welcomes your questions, comments, and news releases via e-mail at peter@ourbroker.com. Copyright © 2004 Realty Times. All Rights Reserved.
Archives-Tuesday, March 09, 2004-Wednesday, March 10, 2004 -Friday, March 12, 2004 -Monday, March 15, 2004 -Tuesday, March 16, 2004 -Monday, March 22, 2004 -Tuesday, March 23, 2004 -Wednesday, March 24, 2004 -Friday, March 26, 2004 -Monday, March 29, 2004 -Friday, April 02, 2004 -Tuesday, April 06, 2004 -Wednesday, April 07, 2004 -Thursday, April 08, 2004 -Friday, April 09, 2004 -Monday, April 12, 2004 -Tuesday, April 13, 2004 -Thursday, April 15, 2004 -Monday, April 19, 2004 -Tuesday, April 20, 2004 -Thursday, April 22, 2004 -Friday, April 23, 2004 -Monday, April 26, 2004 -Tuesday, April 27, 2004 -Wednesday, April 28, 2004 -Thursday, April 29, 2004 -Friday, April 30, 2004 -Monday, May 03, 2004 -Tuesday, May 04, 2004 -Wednesday, May 05, 2004 -Thursday, May 06, 2004 -Friday, May 07, 2004 -Monday, May 10, 2004 -Tuesday, May 11, 2004 -Wednesday, May 12, 2004 -Thursday, May 13, 2004 -Friday, May 14, 2004 -Monday, May 17, 2004 -Tuesday, May 18, 2004 -Wednesday, May 19, 2004 -Thursday, May 20, 2004 -Monday, May 24, 2004 -Tuesday, May 25, 2004 -Wednesday, May 26, 2004 -Wednesday, June 02, 2004 -Thursday, June 03, 2004 -Friday, June 04, 2004 -Monday, June 07, 2004 -Tuesday, June 08, 2004 -Wednesday, June 09, 2004 -Thursday, June 10, 2004 -Friday, June 11, 2004 -Tuesday, June 15, 2004 -Thursday, June 17, 2004 -Friday, June 18, 2004 -Monday, June 21, 2004 -Tuesday, June 22, 2004 -Wednesday, June 23, 2004 -Thursday, June 24, 2004 -Friday, June 25, 2004 -Tuesday, June 29, 2004 -Wednesday, June 30, 2004 -Thursday, July 01, 2004 -Friday, July 02, 2004 -Tuesday, July 06, 2004 -Wednesday, July 07, 2004 -Thursday, July 08, 2004 -Friday, July 09, 2004 -Monday, July 12, 2004 -Tuesday, July 13, 2004 -Wednesday, July 14, 2004 -Thursday, July 15, 2004 -Friday, July 16, 2004 -Monday, July 19, 2004 -Tuesday, July 20, 2004 -Wednesday, July 21, 2004 -Friday, July 23, 2004 -Tuesday, July 27, 2004 -Wednesday, July 28, 2004 -Friday, July 30, 2004 -Wednesday, August 11, 2004 -Thursday, August 12, 2004 -Monday, August 16, 2004 -Wednesday, August 18, 2004 -Thursday, August 19, 2004 -Friday, August 20, 2004 -Monday, August 30, 2004 -Monday, September 13, 2004 -Tuesday, September 14, 2004 -Wednesday, September 15, 2004 -Monday, September 20, 2004 -Tuesday, September 21, 2004 -Monday, September 27, 2004 -Wednesday, September 29, 2004 -Tuesday, October 05, 2004 -Friday, October 08, 2004 -Monday, October 11, 2004 -Tuesday, October 12, 2004 -Thursday, October 14, 2004 -Monday, October 18, 2004 -Thursday, October 21, 2004 -Friday, October 22, 2004 -Tuesday, October 26, 2004 -Thursday, October 28, 2004 -Wednesday, November 03, 2004 -Thursday, November 04, 2004 -Sunday, November 07, 2004 -Monday, November 08, 2004 -Thursday, November 11, 2004 -Tuesday, November 16, 2004 -Monday, November 22, 2004 -Monday, November 29, 2004 -Wednesday, December 01, 2004 -Monday, December 06, 2004 -Tuesday, December 07, 2004 -Saturday, December 11, 2004 -Tuesday, December 14, 2004 -Thursday, December 16, 2004 -Thursday, January 06, 2005 -Monday, January 10, 2005 -Wednesday, January 12, 2005 -Friday, January 14, 2005 -Wednesday, January 19, 2005 -Thursday, January 20, 2005 -Tuesday, January 25, 2005 -Thursday, January 27, 2005 -Friday, January 28, 2005 -Monday, January 31, 2005 -Wednesday, February 09, 2005 -Tuesday, February 15, 2005 -Monday, February 21, 2005 -Friday, March 11, 2005 -Tuesday, March 15, 2005 -Monday, April 04, 2005 -Wednesday, April 13, 2005 -Monday, May 09, 2005 -Monday, September 19, 2005 -Wednesday, October 19, 2005 -Tuesday, January 31, 2006 -Monday, February 13, 2006 -Wednesday, February 15, 2006 -Tuesday, February 21, 2006 -Friday, February 24, 2006 -Monday, February 27, 2006 -Monday, March 06, 2006 -Tuesday, March 07, 2006 -Wednesday, March 08, 2006 -Wednesday, March 15, 2006 -Thursday, March 16, 2006 -Friday, March 17, 2006 -Monday, March 20, 2006 -Tuesday, March 21, 2006 -Monday, March 27, 2006 -Tuesday, March 28, 2006 -Wednesday, March 29, 2006 -Saturday, April 01, 2006 -Monday, April 03, 2006 -Tuesday, April 25, 2006 -Tuesday, May 09, 2006 -Thursday, May 25, 2006 -Thursday, June 01, 2006 -Wednesday, June 07, 2006 -Monday, June 19, 2006 -Tuesday, July 11, 2006 -Wednesday, July 12, 2006 -Wednesday, August 09, 2006 -Saturday, August 12, 2006 -Thursday, November 02, 2006 -Tuesday, November 21, 2006 -Thursday, May 17, 2007 -Thursday, July 26, 2007 -Sunday, May 11, 2008 |
|
||||




